Utah County Republican Party · 2026 Primary
Before you cast your Primary ballot
Republican delegates elected by your neighbors spent 5 weeks vetting these candidates in preparation for the 2026 Convention. 86% of delegates reported feeling more informed than they did as regular voters in past elections.
See what your delegates found out
Republicans elect their delegates every two years at neighborhood precinct caucus meetings. Each delegate represents the Republicans on their street and the streets nearby. Neighbors select delegates from among themselves who will devote volunteer time to meet and thoroughly vet candidates. Because each neighborhood elects its own delegates, every kind of Republican in Utah County can have someone speaking for them at convention. And delegates get something most voters don’t: real time with the candidates, meeting them one-on-one, going to debates, asking the questions that matter. That’s a lot more to go on than a TV ad.What is a nominee?
A Republican nominee is the candidate the delegates elect to represent the party in the general election. If one candidate earns broad enough support at the April convention, they become the sole Republican nominee. If support is split, the top two finalists both advance to a June primary where all registered Republicans cast a vote. A candidate can also reach the primary ballot by gathering signatures, a separate path that bypasses the delegate vetting process.How does the convention work?
How does the convention work?
Contested Primaries
The June 23 Republican primary ballot has more than one candidate in each of these races. Use the convention findings below to inform your vote.
County Commission Seat A
See what delegates said about Brent Bowles
See what delegates said about Brent Bowles
- Non-career-politician background, with multiple supporters describing him as a private citizen pursuing the role rather than as a step in a political career.
- Constitutional and limited-government framing, repeatedly cited in connection with specific positions on county growth, water, taxes, infrastructure, and unchecked data centers.
- Specific fiscal commitments: not raising the property tax rate, reducing the commissioner salary, and cutting the bloat of the commission office.
- His proposal to expand the County Commission from three seats to five was cited by multiple supporters as a structural reform that would give underserved areas like Saratoga Springs and Eagle Mountain better representation.
- His convention-only path to the ballot was named directly by multiple supporters as a reason to support him, in contrast to candidates who pursued signatures.
County Commission Seat B
See what delegates said about David Spencer
See what delegates said about David Spencer
- Twelve years on Orem City Council, repeatedly cited as the most directly relevant executive experience for the commission role.
- Track record on growth and density: multiple supporters cited his work cutting a proposed 350-unit high-density housing project to 75 single-family homes as evidence of holding the line.
- Fiscal discipline in office and stated commitments going forward: the Orem city hall was built without new taxes or debt during his tenure, and he committed to not raising the tax rate, reducing the commissioner salary, and reviewing budget inefficiencies.
- Alignment with Bowles on the proposal to expand the County Commission from three seats to five.
- His convention-only path to the ballot was named directly by multiple supporters as a reason to support him.
See what delegates said about Carolina Herrin
See what delegates said about Carolina Herrin
- Geographic representation: cited as a candidate from outside Orem and Provo, the first time several delegates said the south end of the county would have a voice on the commission.
- Endorsements from precinct chairs and elected officials cited by multiple supporters as a primary reason for their vote.
- Public-safety posture: support for the Sheriff and law enforcement was named directly by several supporters.
- Conservative principles in alignment with the party platform, with specific concerns about TIFs, PIDs, and quasi-governmental entities.
- Strong debate performance and personal interaction quality cited across multiple supporters.
County Clerk
See what delegates said about Aaron Davidson
See what delegates said about Aaron Davidson
- Election integrity work, with multiple supporters naming his advocacy for Cast Vote Records, Fast Cast voting, and voter-ID verification with the legislature.
- His convention-only path to the ballot was named directly by many supporters as a reason to support him.
- Direct engagement with delegates: multiple delegates reported personal phone conversations and substantive answers to hard questions during the vetting process.
- Track record on transparency improvements and a stated willingness to acknowledge and correct past mistakes in office.
- Calm, professional bearing during the debates and town halls, cited as a contrast with his opponent’s posture by several supporters.
See what delegates said about Corey Astill
See what delegates said about Corey Astill
- Focus on the clerk’s office’s administrative responsibilities rather than on broader political advocacy, named by many supporters as the single largest reason for their support.
- Pragmatic posture on mail-in voting and election security, with several supporters citing his view that widespread voter fraud is not supported by evidence they had reviewed.
- Private-sector background and accessibility: multiple supporters described him as available to meet, listen, and answer detailed questions during the vetting process.
- A new-energy alternative for delegates who wanted change from the current direction of the clerk’s office.
State Senate District 18
State Senate District 21
See what delegates said about Brady Brammer
See what delegates said about Brady Brammer
- Specific legislative work, with several supporters naming his judicial-reform efforts.
- Conservative voting record, with multiple supporters describing him as among the most conservative voters in the state Senate; Americans for Prosperity’s endorsement was named directly by several delegates.
- Legal background as a practicing attorney with experience working with judges, cited by supporters as directly relevant to his judicial-process and court-reform work.
- Accessibility during his current term: multiple delegates reported he had personally returned phone calls or replied to messages, including from delegates who disagreed with him on a vote.
- Effectiveness and consistency in office, often described in terms of how he explains and defends his votes.
- His convention-only path to the ballot was named directly by multiple supporters as a reason to support him.
State School Board District 11
See what delegates said about Terry Hutchinson
See what delegates said about Terry Hutchinson
- Track record on a local school board in Washington County, with multiple supporters citing specific results during his prior service.
- Stated commitment to the UCRP platform: he signed the accountability commitment that supporters described as a meaningful alignment with party positions.
- Public record on parental rights and content questions in school libraries, named by many supporters as a defining position.
- Conservative principles in alignment with the party platform, described by multiple supporters as the primary reason for their support.
- Convention-only path to the ballot was named directly by multiple supporters as a reason to support him.
State School Board District 14
See what delegates said about Linda Hanks
See what delegates said about Linda Hanks
- Stated experience and principles named by supporters as relevant for the role.
- Strong debate performance, with supporters citing her knowledge of issues facing students and families.
See what delegates said about Nichole Isom
See what delegates said about Nichole Isom
- Varied background across multiple types of schooling, named by several supporters as relevant context for the role.
- Stated conservative positions and willingness to take clear positions on policy questions.
- Supporters described her as more specific on policy and more willing to be candid in delegate meetings than her opponent.
US House CD-3
See what delegates said about Celeste Maloy
See what delegates said about Celeste Maloy
- Voting record in Congress, with multiple supporters citing her A+ rating from the Susan B. Anthony List for pro-life legislation and her legislative accomplishments to date.
- Endorsements named directly by multiple supporters: Donald Trump, Burgess Owens, and other state Republican leadership.
- Effectiveness in obtaining committee positions and getting results, with several supporters describing her as quietly productive rather than performative.
- Service to rural districts within CD-3, cited specifically by delegates who had spoken with her about rural-community concerns.
- Cross-aisle relationships and electability with moderates and younger voters, described as a structural advantage for holding the seat.
- Multiple supporters describe her as reasonable and respectful in delegate interactions.
See what delegates said about Phil Lyman
See what delegates said about Phil Lyman
- Independence from outside funding and lobbyists, named directly by multiple supporters as the primary reason for their support.
- Constitutional and conservative principles, described by supporters as consistent and unwavering under pressure.
- Willingness to pursue accountability questions on state-level governance, cited as a structural reason to support him.
- Private-sector business background and experience running a business, cited as relevant context for federal-spending decisions.
- Convention-only path to the ballot, named directly by multiple supporters as a reason to support him.
- Focus on election integrity, repeatedly named as a stated legislative priority.
Advanced to General Election
These races were decided at convention. Either one candidate cleared the 60% coalition threshold and no signature challenger qualified, or no other candidate filed at all. The nominees below advance directly to the November general election with no contested Republican primary.
County Auditor
See what delegates said about Gina Tanner
See what delegates said about Gina Tanner
- Direct experience in the office she is seeking, currently serving as Budget Manager in the Auditor’s office, named by many supporters as the most directly relevant background.
- Accounting credentials and subject-matter expertise, including a master’s in accounting and on-track certification as a public auditor.
- Support from colleagues and other county officials, with multiple delegates reporting that the staff who already work in the office spoke favorably of her.
- Strong debate and personal-interaction performance, repeatedly described as calm and composed under criticism.
- Civility during the campaign, repeatedly cited by supporters as a defining trait.
- A clear understanding of the office’s current audit issues and a stated plan to address them, including teaching teams how to improve unfavorable audit outcomes.
State House
Three Utah County State House districts had contested races at the April convention. Each was decided by a decisive convention vote. Each nominee cleared the 60% coalition threshold and is the sole Republican on the primary ballot for their district, so no primary contest is held in these districts.HD52
HD62
HD64
US House CD-4
See what delegates said about Mike Kennedy
See what delegates said about Mike Kennedy
- Voting record in Congress, repeatedly cited as conservative and consistent with party priorities.
- Accessibility and direct engagement with constituents and delegates, with multiple supporters reporting personal conversations about policy.
- Medical background, named by several supporters as relevant context for federal healthcare and funding work.
- Track record of bipartisan legislative work, cited as evidence he can get policy through Congress.
- Strong performance in the convention debate and Q&A, with supporters describing him as knowledgeable and concise.
- Endorsements and personal recommendations from delegates who had known him through prior service in the Utah Legislature.

